Integrated Grading
System for Secretary, HoD, District Officer, Mandal Officer and Below Mandal
Level Functionary
Integrated Grading is assigned based on
the scores of weighted grades of Performance Indicators and Process Indicators
where the weights (70:30 model) are as follows:
Performance Indicators:
70%
Process Indicators: 30%
Grading System for
Performance Indicators
Non-Revenue Earning
Departments
% of Target Achieved
Grade (Score)
≥ 100%
A (4 POINTS)
90-100%
B (3 POINTS)
75-90%
C (2 POINTS)
< 75%
D (1 POINTS)
Revenue Earning
Departments
% of Target Achieved
Grade (Score)
≥ 100%
A (4 POINTS)
95-100%
B (3 POINTS)
90-95%
C (2 POINTS)
< 90%
D (1 POINTS)
Grading
system for Tours & Inspections
% of
≥ 100%
A (4 points)
75-100%
B (3 points)
50-75%
C (2 points)
< 50%
D (1 points)
Grading
system for File Disposal
% of Files Disposed
Grade (Score)
≥ 50%
A (4 points)
25-50%
B (3 points)
10-25%
C (2 points)
< 10%
D (1 points)
Grading
system for Action in Important matters
% of Cases Disposed
Grade (Score)
≥ 50%
A (4 points)
25-50%
B (3 points)
10-25%
C (2 points)
< 10%
D (1 points)
Weights
for Performance Indicators & Process Indicators
Weight
I. Performance Indicators
0.70
II. Process Indicators
0.30
Tours & Inspections
[0.10]
Days Toured
(0.03)
Office Inspections
(0.02)
Surprise Inspections
(0.03)
Routine Inspections
(0.02)
File Disposal
[0.10]
Action in Important matters
[0.10]
Vigilance Cases
ACB Cases
Commission of Enquiry Cases
(0.04)
Departmental Enquiry
Audit Reports/Paras
CMO References
(0.02)
CM’s Announcements
Adverse Media Reports
(0.04)
Calculation of
Integrated Score using the above Grading System
Grading
System based on Score / Grade Point Average
Score/GPA
Grade
≥ 3.5
A
2.5-3.5
B
1.5-2.5
C
< 1.5
D
Maximum Score (GPA) = 4
Minimum Score (GPA) = 1
Where
1a. Performance Score of
Secretary
= Average of Integrated Scores of Portfolio HoDs
Example: Secretary 1 (with 3 HoDs
reporting)
|
HoD |
Performance
Score |
Process
Score |
Integrated
Score |
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) = 0.7*(2) +
0.3*(3) |
|
HoD
1 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
2.7 |
|
HoD
2 |
3.5 |
1.5 |
2.9 |
|
HoD
3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
Secretary 1 Performance
Score = Average (2.7, 2.9, 2.5) =
2.7 | |||
1b. Performance Score of HoD, District Officer,
Mandal Officer and Below Mandal Level Functionary
= Total score of Performance Indicators ¸ Total No. of Performance
Indicators
Example: HoD
1
Total Performance Indicators = 8
Indicators with grade A = 2 (Score = 2 x 4 = 8)
Indicators with grade B = 2 (Score = 2 x 3 = 6)
Indicators with grade C = 2 (Score = 2 x 2 = 4)
Indicators with grade D = 2 (Score = 2 x 1 = 2)
Total Score = 20
No. of Indicators = 8
Performance Score = 20 ¸8 = 2.5
2. Process Score of Secretary, HoD, District Officer,
Mandal Officer and Below Mandal Level Functionary
= Average of (Tours & Inspections Score, File Disposal Score, Action
in Important Matters Score)
2a. Tours &
Inspections Score
= [Days Toured
score (0.3) x 4 or 3 or 2 or 1]
+ [Routine
Inspections score (0.2) x 4 or 3 or 2 or 1]
+ [Surprise
Inspections score (0.3) x 4 or 3 or 2 or 1]
+ [Office
Inspections score (0.2) x 4 or 3 or 2 or 1]
Example: HoD
1
Indicative
Conducted %
Grade (Score)
Days Toured
10
10
100%
A (4)
Routine Inspections
5
4
80%
B (3)
Surprise Inspections 5
3
60%
C (2)
Office Inspections
10
4
40%
D (1)
Tours & Inspections Score = [(0.3 x 4) + (0.2 x
3) + (0.3 x 2) + (0.2 x 1)] = 2.6
* If an indicator under Tours & Inspections
Category is not applicable, then its weight is distributed proportionally across
the remaining indicators (case of Intra-category proportional weightage).
* If Tours & Inspections Category is not
applicable, then its weight (10%) is distributed equally across the other
Process Indicators i.e. File Disposal and Action in Important Matters (case of
Inter-category proportional weightage)
2b. File Disposal
Score
= [Total Files
Score: 4 or 3 or 2 or 1]
Example: HoD
1
Total files during
Disposed
Disposal %
Grade (Score)
the
month
1000
500
50
A (4)
File Disposal Score: 4
* If File Disposal Category is not applicable or
there is no file pending during the period considered, then its weight (10%) is
distributed equally across the other Process Indicators i.e. Tours &
Inspections and Action in Important Matters (case of Inter-category proportional
weightage)
2c. Action in Important
Matters Score
= [Vigilance
Cases, ACB Cases, Commission of Enquiry Cases, Departmental Enquiry Cases, Audit
Reports/Paras Average Score (0.4) x 4 or 3 or 2 or 1]
+ [CMO
References, CM Announcements Average Score (0.2) x 4 or 3 or 2 or
1]
+ [Adverse Media
Reports Score (0.4) x 4 or 3 or 2 or 1]
Example: HoD 1
Total during Disposed Disposal % Grade (Score)
the
month
Sub-Category 1
Vigilance Cases
10
1
10%
C (2)
ACB Cases
10
0
0%
D (1)
Commission of Enquiry 20
1
5%
D (1)
Departmental Enquiry
10
2
20%
C (2)
Audit Reports / Paras
100
30
30%
B (3)
Average
Score for Vigilance, ACB, etc. = (2 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 3)/5 =
1.80
Sub-Category 2
CMO References
20
5
25%
B (3)
CM’s Annoucements
10
8
80%
A (4)
Average Score for CMO References & CM’s
Announcements = (3 + 4)/2 = 3.50
Sub-Category 3
Adverse Media Reports
5
2
40%
B (3)
Action in Important Matters Score = [(0.4 x 1.8) +
(0.2 x 3.5) + (0.4 x 3)] = 2.62
* In case a sub-category is not applicable (i.e.
indicators within a sub-category are not applicable or no case is pending for
the indicators within a sub-category), then its weight is distributed
proportionally across the remaining sub-categories (case of Intra-category
proportional weightage)
* If Action in Important Matters Category is not
applicable, then its weight (10%) is distributed equally across the other
Process Indicators i.e. File Disposal and Tours & Inspections (case of
Inter-category proportional weightage)
Calculation of Process
Score
= Average of
= (2.6 + 4 + 2.62) / 3
= 3.07
|
Performance
Score (1) |
Process
Score (2) |
Integrated
Score (3) = 0.7*(1) +
0.3*(2) |
|
2.5 |
3.07 |
2.67 |